What if Prisoner's Dilemma situation occurs only with a certain probability? My hypothesis is that in such a case 'blind cooperation' might be rational even if the Dilemma does not eventually materialize. This would also mean that doing something about the climate change might be rational even if the potential problem eventually turns out as hoax/not man-controllable. Since the pay-off matrices of climate change (non-)action are probabilistic as well (non-linear climate models), probabilistic game theory is of need here. What do you think?
Etiku profesora nikto neposudzoval.